ARV (Associative Remote Viewing) and RV Background

Remote Viewing (RV) is the gathering of information - operating within a prespecified protocol - from distant targets using intuition rather than the intellect or the usual 5 senses.   RV is probably the most scientifically studied of the intuitive skills.   Many governments investigated the reality of this phenomenon for many years.   Most of these studies have not been publicly released; however, enough information is public to know that this intuitive capability does exist and that it includes gathering information about targets that are distant in space and time, including the future.   RV scientific studies were initially performed at SRI (Stanford Research Institute) with replication studies done at Princeton University.   For more details and for info on current practitioners/instructors of RV, go to:

• the Firedocs website for a wealth of information, including a copy of a document "to serve as a comprehensive explanation of the theory and mechanics" of one type of Remote Viewing, called Coordinate (or Controlled) Remote Viewing (CRV).
• the Remote Viewing Instructional Services (RVIS) website.   Paul Smith, the President of RVIS, was the author of the CRV document mentioned above.   Also the graphics above are from the examples on his website.   The sketch was developed after the preliminary steps outlined in the document.
• the Problems Solutions Innovations (P>S>I) website.   Lyn Buchanan, the Executive Director of PSI, has provided a full transcript of a CRV session.
• the Hawaii Remote Viewers' Guild (HRVG) website. Glen Wheaton leads this group and their website is regularly updated with ongoing RV targets and completed RV sessions.

Associative Remote Viewing (ARV) is an application of remote viewing that dates back to the 1970s.   Here's an example of how ARV can be used for precognitive work - let's predict (remembering that accuracy can be better than chance, but not perfect) the winner of the next U.S. presidential election:

• The winner will be a member of the ABC Party, or the winner will NOT be a member of the ABC Party - a two choice scenario.
• We "associate" each possible outcome with a specific target (e.g., ABC wins = a rock formation photo, ABC does not win = panda bear photo).
• The remote viewer is then tasked to describe the target (ID# 834217) that he/she will be shown after the election results are confirmed.   The remote viewer's description is based on intuition and results in a transcript of words and sketches.
• This transcript is given to a "judge" or "analyst" who correlates it (using his/her intellect) with the two possible targets and chooses one as the "prediction". Thus the judge makes the primarily intellectually-derived prediction based on what the RVer intuitively describes using an RV protocol.
• Feedback of the correct target-photo will be provided to the RVer after the election results are confirmed.

In the past, the RVer and the judge were generally two different people.  However, our ARV applied research and the results of similar research by others show that this is not necessary.  One person can assume both the remote viewer and judge roles.   More importantly, there is great personal growth in getting into both of these mindsets (RVer/judge) and observing the differences in your self as you act in an intuitive fashion versus an intellectual fashion.